- On Wednesday, President Donald Trump praised the federal government for overturning Obama-era fair housing rules by saying that suburban people don’t have to be “attracted” by low-income housing in the their headquarters.
- “I’m happy to inform all people living their Suburban Lifestyle that you won’t be left sad or hurt financially by building low-income housing in your neighborhood,” Trump responds.
- The 2015 Affirmative Affirmation Regulation required local governments seeking federal funding for housing to collect extensive data showing non-discrimination in housing in their communities.
- Wednesday̵7;s tweets were among Trump’s most explicit steps for fear and white complaint in his bid to win back suburban voters who have long strongly rejected the GOP since taking office. -load.
- Visit the Business Insider homepage for more stories.
President Donald Trump has hailed the Department of Housing and Urban Development as a rule of Obama-era fair housing rule by saying that Americans living in a “suburban“ dream ”are no longer be attracted “by having lower-income families in their neighborhoods.
Last Thursday, Ben Carson, the secretary of housing and urban development, said he would repeal the 2015 Affirmatively Advancing regulation. The rule required state and local communities to seek federal funding for housing to collect extensive data on demographics and living conditions and, importantly, to show that they did not perpetuate racial discrimination.
“I’m happy to inform all people living their Suburban Lifestyle that you will no longer be tempted or hurt financially by having low-income housing built in your neighborhood,” Trump tweeted Wednesday. “Your house prices will go up based on the market, and crime will go down. I repealed the Obama-Biden AFFH Rule. Enjoy!”
—Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 29, 2020
Housing lawyers criticized the rule change, saying it would give localities much more freedom to allow discriminatory and unequal housing conditions to persist.
The National Coalition for Low-cost Housing, for example, said the rule change “represents a complete withdrawal from efforts to remove historic, government-led models of discrimination and segregation of housing across states.” United States “and should” allow communities to ignore the essential obligations of racial desegregation. Fair housing law. “
Wednesday’s tweets were among Trump’s most explicit steps for fear and white complaint in his bid to win back suburban voters who have long strongly rejected the GOP since taking office. -load.
In 2018, Democratic challengers lent 40 seats in the House of Representatives largely by winning over college-educated suburban voters, according to data collected by CityLab, which found that 22 of the 40 were “dense or suburban” districts. scarce suburbs “.
Now, as polls find former Vice President Joe Biden finding Trump among white, college-educated and suburban voters, Trump has used fear to try to convince voters that housing plans of Biden make their neighborhoods less secure and desirable.
“Suburban Housewives of America should read this article,” Trump tweeted Thursday, linking a New York Post opinion column criticizing Biden’s policy plans to expand housing affordable in the suburbs and set standards to prevent discrimination in housing. “Biden will destroy your neighborhood and your American dream. I will preserve it, and make it even better!”
Some commentators said Trump’s references to “suburban housewives” and attempts to link Biden to crime and disorder in the suburbs seem to stem from an old-fashioned view of the suburbs as almost completely occupied by white people. rich people who fear crime and trust in its diversity. communities.
While the fierce fighting against low-income housing persists in many suburban communities, today’s suburbs are far more racially and economically different than those in the middle to late 20th century, when a “white flight” forced to many white Americans fleeing urban areas to suburbs.
“For many people, the idea that Biden wants to‘ destroy the suburbs ’doesn’t make sense,” Paul Waldman of the Washington Post wrote in an opinion column on July 21st. “It’s only coherent if you think an increase in racial diversity would ‘destroy’ the suburbs, and that means the suburbs only exist if they’re all white.”